No, because the prices of movies alone keep going up every so many years. I think they just went up to $12 at some places and the cost of that goes up in the 3D movies. Supposedly, they are paying for the glasses, and after a movie you have to give the glasses back; most of the time it is not worth it.”
— Drew Claud, sophomore criminal justice major

Sometimes it depends. ‘Avatar’ was worth it but ‘Alice in Wonderland’ was not. I think it would have been just as good if it wasn’t in 3D, plus when it comes having to buy the glasses you can’t reuse your glasses? They won’t take down the charge so that is not worth it either.”
— Alexis Burroughs, Pre Physical Therapy Major

Not at all. The effects are not wowing enough. I am going to give you an extra $4, it’s cool to pay $1.50 but $4 is ridiculous. It is like watching regular movies, it would be good if the extra $4 for the whole theater where the seats are moving. Just watching a movie that doesn’t come to my face is not worth it to pay $4 extra.”
— Octavious Price, sophomore chemistry major

I don’t like it because if you have already seen a 3D before another 3D, you should already have your same glasses and you shouldn’t have to be charged for those same glasses.”
— Domineque Jack, freshman french international major

Absolutely not, because there is not actual 3D. 3D is supposed to be up front in your face. ‘Alice in Wonderland’ was better than ‘Clash of the Titans’ but there is no actual 3D like Disney World.”
— Rebecca Johnson, junior early childhood education major

It makes sense to get charged when you know it is animated, when it is not animated it’s not worth the price.”
— Katie Miller, freshman education major

Share